This week began arguments between Chile and Peru
in the International
Court in La Haya product of
maritime conflict that pits two countries. The first step has been followed closely by media
Chilean and Peruvian, while much of the population still does not fully
understand the conflict. What seeks ultimately to Peru?
by Williamson Catalán Maldonado
In 1952 Peru, Ecuador and Chile
agreed that their maritime boundaries would be subject to their respective parallel border. The treaty
is known as Santiago Declaration on the Maritime Zone, and two years afterwards
the three parties signed the Convention on Maritime Border Special Zone, which
ratified the old covenant. However, the current lawsuit of Peru at the Hague
tribunal holds that the maritime boundary with Chile should be equidistant from
the border pillar of Tacna, and that means displace the limit
several miles south.
When in 2005, Peru enacted
“Ley de Línea Base”, the point 266 was established as the end of the land border. Being further south than the Milestone 1,
hitherto land border limit, Peru claims that the 16 thousand
square meters that make up this new area belongs. Peruvian demand, then, is to set
the maritime border with a line
equidistant from the border; sovereignty over those 16 thousand square meters to claim as their own; and
sea area Chile outside that Peru also recognizes his.
On December 12, Peru will complete the oral arguments, while Chile will do
the same on 14. The results, in turn, will be known in July 2013, in a ruling
that seeks to end a dispute that has been developing for years.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario